- Security (safety): for defenders (ISFJ);
- Velocity (scalability): for megalomaniacs (ENTJ);
- Engineering (design): for geeks (INTJ);
- Transparency (decentralization): for crypto punks (ISTP);
For Defenders (click)
Theoretically, there is not unbreakable protocols. Even the most battle-proved platforms had a couple of bad days in their past. SECURITY Rating 'b+' and higher to those very few projects which meet all major safety requirements such as an impeccable consensus algorithm, absence of registered protocols breaches, continuous code upgrades consistent with rising threat level, periodic code audit, bounty programs for hackers etc. (ISFJ - Protector)
How to rate a project?
To view rating details or to add one of your own click on the corresponding field in the table column (for 'How to rate a project?' see Guide)
| Name | SECURITY | Users Rating | Expert Rating | System | Vision | Execution | Tokenomics | SVET Rating |
|---|
Algorand |
a- | c+ | b | a- | c+ | b | b | b- |
Avalanche |
b+ | nada | b+ | b+ | b | a- | b+ | nada |
BarnBridge |
b+ | b | b+ | b+ | a | b- | b- | b |
[EYWA] |
b+ | b- | b | b+ | b | b | b | b |
Kava Network |
a | nada | nada | a- | nada | b- | nada | nada |
MasterCoin |
b+ | b+ | b | b | b | b | b+ | b+ |
Monero |
a | a | b+ | a- | a- | b- | b | a- |
[MPOne] |
b+ | b | b+ | a- | a | b+ | c+ | b+ |
[RCST] |
b+ | c+ | b- | b- | b | b- | c+ | b- |
[Rubicon Financial Technologies] |
b+ | b- | b | b | b | b | b- | b- |
Stratos |
b+ | nada | b | b | b+ | b- | b- | nada |
Here might be your Review.
Why Shall You Use the SVET Platform?
Community Members
Start building your wealth with only USD 100.
Founders
Gain a competitive edge by leveraging experts opinion.
Investors
Get a first-mover advantage.